|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Myth #3Skimming the wall cavity with spray-applied insulation completely solves air infiltration RealityEveryone knows the house is a system. Spray-foam inside a cavity does not come close to stopping all air leakage. Air infiltration happens all over the house with the wall cavities only contributing a small amount (14%1). To solve air infiltration you need to address air flow throughout the structure, with the most important places being gypsum board, gaps, and penetrations, not the cavity. Spray-foam insulation in a typical application is not a continuous air barrier. For that you need to seal under sill plates, fill band joists, and seal around penetrations such as recessed lights and electrical boxes. If the foam shrinks, that seal could be lost. Fiber glass insulation with an air barrier or skim coating provides a high performance wall with excellent thermal performance and minimal air leakage at a cost effective price point. Myth #4Spray-foam insulation is a one step solution to air leakage. RealityNo cavity insulation alone is capable of providing a continuous air barrier. While spray-foam insulation products can be used to fill gaps and voids, they are not always applied that way and don’t always solve all air leakage problems. Achieving a continuous air barrier with spray-foam insulation can be a very costly solution and something that may not be feasible if framing techniques keep some areas from being completely sealed. If your insulation provider is claiming that they provide a “one-step” solution, look again. For an effective solution to air infiltration and thermal performance, choose fiber glass batt, loose fill or spray-applied insulation with a continuous air barrier outside or a skim coating inside. This is common building practice that is high performing and cost effective. Myth #5R-value doesn’t matter. RealityAccording to the Federal Trade Commission, “R-value ‘is the only quantifiable...measure of thermal resistance that might provide the typical consumer with a means to evaluate insulation products’.”2 Any claim that R-value may be discounted or enhanced for air infiltration capabilities is false and misleading. There is no provision or language within the FTC R-value Rule that explicitly, implicitly or even slightly hints that there is “any performance yardstick suited” for measuring thermal performance other than R-value. Don’t be fooled. Air infiltration and thermal performance are two separate and distinct issues. Myth #6Some types of insulation are better at air sealing than others. RealityAll insulation needs proper air sealing. Some spray-foam and cellulose insulation manufacturers claim that studies show their products are better at air sealing. The NAHB Research Center found the following studies to be flawed or limited either because they tested only a few houses, or did not provide equal air sealing to all insulation. Other studies found insignificant differences but are often misquoted. The studies found by NAHB RC3 to be limited, flawed or frequently misquoted include:
Building scientists and the Department of Energy and the Environmental Protection Agency agree, and the code mandates, that all insulation needs proper air sealing. Don’t be fooled. References:1. G. Yuill, 1997 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NAIMA does not state or imply that each and every insulation installation job will qualify for a tax credit. NAIMA does not warrant or guarantee a tax benefit will be awarded for each and every addition of insulation. Eligibility may vary by jurisdiction. Please carefully consult the Internal Revenue Service (www.IRS.gov) rules and guidelines on how to qualify for the energy efficiency tax credit. NAIMA does not provide or offer professional tax counseling.